About Jonathan Kasumba My Profile Favorites | Pics | Portfolio Work

Name / Experience / Skills

Me2's profile wall (72)

Please login to comment!
24 days ago NemoDesigns said:
http://carbodydesign.com/archive/2010/06/audi-one-concept/ hit me up on yahoo messenger soon, i have some PCH ideas based on this link
163 days ago R/Evo said:
Don't know whether the deliverables need to change, as the design criteria has pretty much been different between comps. Maybe BB's idea, like each competition LM randomly selects 250 members that are the only ones allowed to vote. I still would also want a more in depth scoring system and that all voters are required to also submit a critique with each vote. Also as many entries don't have the required deliverables, maybe they shouldn't be allowed to enter or that a penalty will be deducted. I also still believe that the contest has a too short a time frame. Look at all the major contests, they are typically annual, and you have like 3-5 months to submit. I could see more like 4 comps a year, excluding designing smaller items and designing skins. Design shouldn't be a race!
163 days ago R/Evo said:
I remember that they didn't want to have more categories or a 10/100 point system was that it may make it too difficult and people wouldn't vote. I agree with you, I would possibly prefer having fewer(?), more contemplative members giving their scores.
163 days ago R/Evo said:
I don't remember whether you were a part of the online discussion we had sometime ago about changing the voting. We now have 3 categories to vote on, and several of us wanted one or 2 more. I also wanted a 9/10 point voting criteria for each category, in fact a 100 points would be even better. Right now for me there is a lot of projects that I give a 3 or 4, but no way are they really that close. Creme dela creme for 5's.
163 days ago R/Evo said:
Just thought of another complication: if a designer uses 'checkup', his identity will have to be hidden there too. Also the designer would have to be careful in his replies there, and in his entry page, to further conceal his identity.
163 days ago Bentley Boy said:
Amen to your concealed voting idea!!! Way to go Me2!

Me2 said... (150)

Comment Type 390z legacy 74 days ago:
Hi Judge, nice work; I feel the door sill needs to be readdressed to visually strengthen the cabin stance. U did the rims so nicely. Good job
Comment Type Shock Testing - Round 3 74 days ago:
I have to say the RF has just tipped the scale to ICON status in my books. The suspensions are unbelievable; the ride dynamics really work the RF in that environment. LM you have made a desirable vehicle in no time. BRILLIANT work.
Comment Type EV.31 98 days ago:
Its coming along very well. I do think you may have to consider lowering the headlights, so on a full beam the glare wont distract coming traffic. Good job
Comment Type wing 98 days ago:
Hi Judge, thats a lovely sketch. Its very fine 2 me
Comment Type for the detroit entrepeneur 98 days ago:
The reversed door style works the design soo well. The cab is may favorite part of the design, but i do feel the bull grill if tweaked alittle would complete the front totally IMO. All the same its a great job Braun keep it coming.
Comment Type Ex-Ta-C reloaded 98 days ago:
Thx filski, yes ill do the same treatment on the rear, to see how it will work. Glad to hear your take @chappy. Nice take on the new borg warner SST. For the styling suggestion, i do think it would take a turn to hummer and jeep. Their styling cues are strong and are so easy to fall into. Thx again
Comment Type First Low Ride Height Configuration! 98 days ago:
THAT IS ONE MEAN LOW RIDE. WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOWWEEEE. THIS IS GOING ON MY DESKTOP ASAP. THE RF IS BEAUTIFUL INDEED.

Portfolio Work (5)

Image 43039
Image 43040